You have now seen the case in two layers. The trial pages gave you the core courtroom logic: Patsy Wright, the poisoned NyQuil, the delayed method, the State’s case against Robert Cox, and the defense argument that the prosecution has not erased competing paths. The contest pages restored the sharper pressure points: Steve Horning’s museum-control issue, Robert Cox’s deeper motive details, and the unresolved side-suspects and side-threads that complicate the field.
Who killed Patsy Wright?
Why did they do it?
How was the poison delivered?
Which clue proves your answer better than the others?
Which clue looked important, but turned out to be the biggest red herring?
The bottle matters. The routine matters. The timing matters. The private relationships around Patsy matter. The wider wax museum shadow matters only if it helps you understand the poisoning rather than distracts from it.
Some jurors will believe the case narrows to Robert Cox once the motive and method are combined. Others will believe the same details leave too many living alternatives. Both positions are possible inside this game. Your duty is not to agree with the loudest voice. It is to decide what the evidence itself supports.